Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Hazem Naow vs Sebastian Gima Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Naow vs Gima analysis and find out who is favored!
Hazem Naow vs Sebastian Gima Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Naow 2 - 0 Gima
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Naow has won 48.86% of points on their second serve, while Gima has won 49.74%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Naow, in recent form, has won 56.54% of their opponent's second serve points, while Gima has won 57.82%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.77% and 34.83% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Naow has saved 62.75% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gima has saved 58.97% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Naow has won 67.95% of matches played (W/L 53/ 25), with Gima winning 56.79% (W/L 46/ 35) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Naow has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 71% (W/L 65/ 27), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 55/ 39). Gima has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 49/ 31), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Naow has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 72.92% of matches (W/L 35/ 13), where as Gima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 59.7% of matches (W/L 40/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Naow winning 2 times and Gima being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Naow winning 4 and Gima winning 1. The last match between Naow and Gima was at the M15 Monastir, 17-01-2022, Final, Hard with Hazem Naow getting the victory 5-7 7-6(5) 7-6(7).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:44:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Naow and Gima have played a deciding set 1 times, with Naow winning 1 times and Gima 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Naow winning 3, and Gima 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Naow has played against opponents with an average rank of 194.63 while Gima has played against players with an average rank of 160.63.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Naow has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gima has won 54% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Naow has converted 43.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gima has converted 42.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
345
Rank
323
High
24
Age
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
494
Rank
436
High
22
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
65% (152-81)
Career Total W/L
58% (174-124)
71% (27-11)
YTD W/L
56% (20-16)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Hazem Naow | Sebastian Gima |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 32 | 27 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:44:30 | 2:44:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (144/206) | 64% (129/201) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 60% (86/144) | 57% (73/129) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (34/62) | 47% (34/72) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (12/27) | 38% (11/29) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (94/201) | 42% (86/206) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 7-6(5) 7-6(7) |
Stats 
Hazem Naow
Player
Sebastian Gima
69%
(
83 of
121)
1st Serve %
63%
(
81 of
128)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
59%
(
49 of
83)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
48 of
81)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
42%
(
51 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
58 of
128)
128
Total Points Won
121
|
||||
| 6-2 7-6(9) |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Sebastian Gima
72%
(
61 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Hazem Naow | Sebastian Gima |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 71% (27/11) | 56% (20/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 66% (56/29) | 55% (46/38) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (433/350) | 52% (403/370) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 62% (8/5) | 59% (20/14) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 76% (19/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.11 |
| Aces Total | 78 | 41 |
| DFs per game | 0.36 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 137 | 68 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:10 | 1:49:15 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 255.76 | 149.83 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1634/2598) | 61% (1524/2491) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (1126/1634) | 64% (978/1524) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (471/964) | 50% (481/967) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (130/300) | 43% (132/308) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (1096/2554) | 44% (1142/2612) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 68% (15/7) | 40% (2/3) |
| Futures W/L | 80% (12/3) | 58% (18/13) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 71% (27/38) | 54% (19/35) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 67% (4/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 78% (7/9) | 45% (5/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (23/23) | 90% (20/18) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (23/0) | 10% (20/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 27% (15/4) | 13% (16/2) |
Hazem Naow Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Hazem Naow
49%
(
32 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
73)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Hazem Naow
95%
(
54 of
57)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
85%
(
52 of
61)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Hazem Naow
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Hazem Naow
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Hazem Naow
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Mae Malige
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
36%
(
15 of
42)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Dario Huber
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
95)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
42)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gregoire Barrere
Player
Hazem Naow
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
74%
(
32 of
43)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
50
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Michael Geerts
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
8
Aces
11
7
Double Faults
2
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
46 of
64)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
33%
(
35 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
97)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Sebastian Gima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Jonas Forejtek
60%
(
58 of
97)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
106)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
6
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
47 of
61)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
32 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
106)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
7-6(1) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Sebastian Gima
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
9
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
24%
(
4 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mihai Razvan Marinescu
Player
Sebastian Gima
64%
(
76 of
119)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
44%
(
52 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
82)
100
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Vojtech Vales
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ilya Snitari
Player
Sebastian Gima
51%
(
62 of
122)
1st Serve %
69%
(
77 of
111)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
2
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
43%
(
26 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
47%
(
57 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
52 of
111)
117
Total Points Won
116
|
7-5 2-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elliot Benchetrit
Player
Sebastian Gima
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
49 of
106)
97
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Dax Donders
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Niels Lootsma
Player
Sebastian Gima
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Ioan Alexandru Chirita
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
93)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
47%
(
22 of
47)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
47%
(
32 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
51 of
93)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Florent Bax
68%
(
77 of
114)
1st Serve %
55%
(
64 of
116)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
47 of
64)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
39%
(
45 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
47 of
116)
116
Total Points Won
114
|
2-6 7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Naow Vs Gima Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Naow are available here and Gima photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
